Hi all,
First time poster here. I recently moved from a mostly off-grid tiny house to a grown-up, “real” house (grid connected). The house is all electric, and it makes me panic to think what I’d do in the middle of a northeast US winter (1500ft elevation) if the power goes out for a week. I guess a generator is an option, but I’d love something less noisy.
To ease some of that panic, and since I’m used to being grid independent, my long-term goal (fantasy, even) is to install a masonry heater. The house is an 80’s modular home, constructed in two sections and joined at a central beam spanning the length of the house. There is an existing tiny, 80’s-style wood fireplace that needs work and, because it is located on an exterior wall, isn’t the ideal location for a masonry heater.
I haven’t consulted any professionals yet (none in my area, and I don’t want to waste anyone’s time for a project that is probably years down the road), but my thought is that the best location for a masonry heater is on the interior wall at the central beam. What would make it even better is if I could straddle the central beam and have about 2/3 of the heater in the kitchen and the rest in the living room. The attached photo shows a sort-of floor plan. The brick red rectangle is the existing fireplace. The light purple rectangle is where I’m picturing the masonry heater.
My question is whether it’s reasonable to consider a heater that straddles what is clearly the main support for the house. I am just now considering that maybe it could be built without removing any studs and just a stone facade on one side that makes it appear to be a solid unit through the wall.
I know anything can be considered “reasonable” if you throw enough money at it, but am I nuts to think about having it straddle the beam?
Thanks!
